How top climate alarmists use secrecy to stay on top(AR5 leak)

Draft IPCC report leaked (the evidence is so overwhelming it has to be kept secret!) 

Joanne Nova reminds us of how the powers that be use secrecy to control the climate message through the media:

“What was the point of keeping the IPCC draft secret? The point is so the IPCC can control both the content and the PR. The IPCC wants a free kick, and they get one if the world doesn’t see how they arrive at the conclusion, and if critics can’t specifically point to errors or flaws until weeks after the giant press circus has done its megaphone production.

It’s how the media game works. First they release the “up and coming” scary headline. (Already done for AR5.) Critics can’t criticize what they can’t see….

story continues at link above.

The image links to a pdf file produced by Joanne Nova that explains where many tens of billions of tax dollars have gone.  The scale of climate science enterprise is a surprise to a lot of people.

The leak story at WUWT focuses on a scientific aspect of the next report.

IPCC AR5 draft leaked, contains game-changing admission of enhanced solar forcing

The powers that be will of course continue to carry on with their deceptions.


Other climate news today:

Deutsche Bank execs investigated in carbon fraud crackdown

Last I heard, Deutsche bank has a massive green portfolio and uses an advisor from one of the boards of one of those scientific organizations that all produce those suspicious statements on climate science.

From Tom Nelson:

Former IPCC lead author Ken Caldeira: “There’s kind of a pretense with these IPCC reports that it’s this latest science that’s happened in the last two or three years that’s really going to make the difference, that’s going to tip the balance in favor of action…”

Tom Nelson notes that Ken Caldeira resigned over dissatisfaction with the IPCC. Caldeira’s name appears on a lot of ocean acidification research. Sounds like a democrat being allowed to vote pro-life for strategic reasons?

This entry was posted in Agenda 21, AR5, climate, Climate Change, global warming, IPPC, journalistic bias, UN. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s